Kaminski, Valter AugustoFollador, Marcelo Augusto2025-03-202024https://repositorio.uricer.edu.br/handle/35974/813The present research aimed to analyze the (un)necessity of reasonable suspicion for conducting personal searches by the preventive police, in light of Brazilian law, specifically regarding the Federal Constitution and the Code of Criminal Procedure. The study sought to identify the main implications of this practice concerning the protection of fundamental rights, especially the presumption of innocence. Initially, the concept of police power and the role of the Military Police were addressed, followed by an analysis of the legal norms regulating personal searches, with emphasis on the requirement of reasonable suspicion. The main problems arising from the lack of objective criteria for conducting personal searches without a judicial warrant were discussed, considering the judicial interpretation on the matter. Additionally, the labeling theory was examined, which demonstrates how certain police approaches can reinforce social stigmas, disproportionately affecting specific groups. Finally, the study proposed reflections on the need for clearer and more objective regulation to ensure the legality of police actions, ensuring that the use of reasonable suspicion does not violate fundamental rights. It was concluded that the subject requires further research and ongoing discussions to improve legislation and police practices, ensuring a balance between public security and respect for individual rights. The methodology used in this research was the deductive method, with a descriptive analytical approach. Regarding the technical procedures, the study was classified as a bibliographic research, based on scientific articles, books, legislation, case law, and relevant resolutions on the topic.pt-BRDireitoBusca pessoalFundada suspeitaSegurança públicaTrabalho de Conclusão de Curso