Esposito, Luís AlbertoPereira, Felipe Mateus Nehring2024-03-042024-03-042020https://repositorio.uricer.edu.br/handle/35974/566The present monographic work sought to analyze the controversial aspects of the writ of mandamus. Firstly, it aimed to understand the historical context of the institute, as well as the concept of the writ of mandamus and its two kinds, the individual and the collective mandamus. Subsequently, in view of Comparative Law, institutions similar to the writ of mandamus that exist in alien legal systems were studied. Then, the legislative evolution of the judicial remedy was clarified, both from a constitutional point of view and from a legal perspective, through the analysis of Bills No. 1,533/51 and No. 12,016/2009. Finally, some of the controversies surrounding the institute were analyzed during the validity of the aforementioned laws and in the light of jurisprudence and doctrine. The methodological approach used in the work ensued through bibliographic and documentary research, using the inductive and analytical-descriptive method, with the aim of contributing as a theoretical reinforcement on the topic, to whom the topic can be of interest.pt-BRDireitoMandado de segurançaDireito constitucional processualTrabalho de Conclusão de Curso